blonde billy #2 (
wythersake) wrote in
therookery2024-07-23 06:38 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
stupid network banter | crystals
Now that we've the proper criteria, who do we think is compatible? Quietly simmering with lust, and unable to act upon it by virtue of their, oh. Virtues.
While we're at it, we ought to determine the next public breakdown. Perhaps we can reuse the quiz — Have you ever shared laughter, only while quivering with barely-controlled rage, etcetera —
no subject
no subject
no subject
Well, while we're on old sayings, if the shoe fits...?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Well, consider taking it up again. It's dreadfully quiet about here, and the last time that happened, someone dropped dracolisks on my dinner plans.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
[ with the other babies ]
no subject
( you can't prove this is or isn't a dig at isaac )
no subject
Ew.
no subject
( not a dig, kostos seems to actively prefer that. )
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)