tony stark. (
propulsion) wrote in
therookery2019-09-11 06:04 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
001.
FORM: Book
SENDER: Tony Stark
RECIPIENT:
NOTES: Set mid-Kingsway.
dear diary
it's me tony. day 2 of whatever this is. infection maintains. ("anchor"? fixed point. "shard"? piece of something.) probably missed my window for autoamputation. dang it.
angles:
- make believe equiv of imaging(?). how deep does infection run
- timelines of progression? relating proximity? further symptoms? need more data.
- output. find means of quantifying.
- interaction with rifts. absorption?
- applications?
- extraction?
- super cool sleep-glove that reduces harmful blue spectrum light. nts: patent that.
- potential variables in high 5ing with other "rifters".
first things first: do the readings. if only there was some way of connecting with the broader riftwatch community and inquiring about the groundwork already put down for anchor study maybe via some kind of a magical book. gosh the olden times are just the worst.
guess i'll have to do this the hard way.
no subject
GERVAIS V.
after several uncertain minutes;
you get a lot of takers by the way?
no subject
( but in the maker's absence, man must help himself. )
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE RIFTWATCH'S ONLY AMPUTEE WAS LIKE THAT WHEN WE FOUND HER.
( officer. )
no subject
sword arm y/n
no subject
( out of interest. )
no subject
Y = big maybe
no subject
I HAVE A FORM IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GRANT PERMISSION FOR THE LIMB TO BE STUDIED IF IT WERE TO BE ACCIDENTALLY REMOVED.
no subject
hey while i got you in my dms i take it the lack of volunteers isn't just because you're cheap wrt dope sword arms?
no subject
IT IS MY EXPERIENCE THAT ON THE WHOLE MOST INDIVIDUALS PREFER THEIR LIMBS ATTACHED WHILE ATTACHED IS AN OPTION.
no subject
here is the question do people not surgically remove their weird magic hands bc it doesn't work or bc it is unproven?
no subject
THUS MY INTEREST.
THERE ARE OTHER FACTORS THAT MAY INFLUENCE THE DECISION, BAR LACK OF EVIDENCE AND GENERAL UNWILLINGNESS TO REMOVE A LIMB, BUT FOR MOST THOSE APPEAR SUFFICIENT. WE ARE AWARE THAT THE ANCHOR-SHARDS SPREAD SLOWLY BUT THAT THEY DO SPREAD; THAT THEY CAN ULTIMATELY CONSUME THE BEARER. IT WOULD NOT BE UNWISE TO CONSIDER THAT IN THE EVENT THAT A HAND WERE REMOVED, IF THE ANCHOR-SHARD WAS NOT EFFECTIVELY REMOVED WITH IT, IT MAY THEN PROGRESS FURTHER FASTER.
( upon consideration, )
A MATTER I WOULD RAISE BEFORE AMPUTATION AND NOT AFTER.
no subject
no subject
( por que no los dos )
no subject
you study anchorshards?
no subject
no subject
1. got any research papers/notes/whatever i can peruse?
2. are they all in capital letters?
no subject
I FIND MY WRITING MORE EFFICIENT THIS WAY.
no subject
no subject
THE BATHS ARE COMMUNAL.
( he's pretty sure he still knows what tony's getting at. )
no subject
no subject
( which definitely is not what he was proposing, anthony untested risk stark, )
I HAVE SPACE IN THE RESEARCH LABORATORIES. IN THE EVENT THAT YOU TAKE IT UPON YOURSELF TO AMPUTATE YOUR ARM, I AM AVAILABLE TO THE INFIRMARY WHEN MY EMERGENCY SURGERY EXPERTISE IS REQUIRED.
no subject
thanks gervais v
if that is your real name.
no subject
again, a minute longer than it takes to write the below;
no subject
JEEVES.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)