tony stark. (
propulsion) wrote in
therookery2019-09-11 06:04 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
001.
FORM: Book
SENDER: Tony Stark
RECIPIENT:
NOTES: Set mid-Kingsway.
dear diary
it's me tony. day 2 of whatever this is. infection maintains. ("anchor"? fixed point. "shard"? piece of something.) probably missed my window for autoamputation. dang it.
angles:
- make believe equiv of imaging(?). how deep does infection run
- timelines of progression? relating proximity? further symptoms? need more data.
- output. find means of quantifying.
- interaction with rifts. absorption?
- applications?
- extraction?
- super cool sleep-glove that reduces harmful blue spectrum light. nts: patent that.
- potential variables in high 5ing with other "rifters".
first things first: do the readings. if only there was some way of connecting with the broader riftwatch community and inquiring about the groundwork already put down for anchor study maybe via some kind of a magical book. gosh the olden times are just the worst.
guess i'll have to do this the hard way.
no subject
( which definitely is not what he was proposing, anthony untested risk stark, )
I HAVE SPACE IN THE RESEARCH LABORATORIES. IN THE EVENT THAT YOU TAKE IT UPON YOURSELF TO AMPUTATE YOUR ARM, I AM AVAILABLE TO THE INFIRMARY WHEN MY EMERGENCY SURGERY EXPERTISE IS REQUIRED.
no subject
thanks gervais v
if that is your real name.
no subject
again, a minute longer than it takes to write the below;
no subject
JEEVES.
no subject
[ Which is only marginally more important than nickname acquisition. ]
no subject
no subject
no subject
SHE IS NOT A MAGE, YET THIS IS MAGIC. TO DATE, NO MORE HORSES HAVE DISPLAYED MAGICAL ABILITY THAN HAVE BEEN STRUCK BY ANCHOR-SHARDS. THE ANCHOR WAS BORNE AND WIELDED IN ITS WHOLE FORM BY THE LATE EVELYN TREVELYAN; IT IS MY PERSONAL OPINION THAT THE CAPACITY TO WIELD IS THE DIFFERENCE. DWARVES DO NOT PRODUCE MAGES. DWARVES HAVE NOT PRODUCED SHARD-BEARERS.
( if a dwarf shows up tomorrow with an anchor-shard, gervais is more likely to start revising theories about dwarves, not the anchor. )
no subject
[ Which is inaccurate on at least two levels, Tony, you're just not a fan of not knowing things. ]
ok fine. shardanchor => innate magic potential => non-dwarf sentient beings because ??? reasons i don't have enough in me to unpack all of that on paper. what's your niece's name?
no subject
( gervais harbors suspicions about yngvi's goose and they are that all geese are morally bad. )
HER NAME IS GWENAĆLLE BAUDIN. IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK WITH HER, SHE RESIDES WITH PROVOST BAUDIN OF THE RESEARCH DIVISION IN THE CENTRAL TOWER. HE IS, LIKE YOURSELF, A RIFTER.
THE QUESTIONS RAISED HERE ARE TANGENTIALLY RELEVANT TO MY PREVIOUS RESEARCH FOCUS, PRIOR TO THIS WAR AND THE ONE PRECEDING IT. I STUDIED THE QUESTION OF WHY ELVES AND HUMANS PRODUCE ONLY HUMAN CHILDREN. A SIMILAR PHENOMENON IS PRODUCED IN THE RARE EVENT OF A DWARF AND ELF REPRODUCING, WHERE THE CHILD CARRIES ONLY DWARVEN TRAITS, THOUGH I REGRETTABLY COULD RELY ONLY ON SECONDARY SOURCES REGARDING THAT. IN THE EVENT A HUMAN AND A DWARF REPRODUCE, HOWEVER, THE CHILD DISPLAYS TRAITS OF BOTH BLOODLINES. THIS SEEMS MORE NATURAL, AND YET IN THE WIDER CONTEXT I WOULD HAVE EXPECTED OTHERWISE.
HAD I MADE MORE PROGRESS IN THAT RESEARCH, PERHAPS I WOULD HAVE MORE ANSWERS NOW.
no subject
i don't bring much with me except for the cumulative knowledge of scientific advancement produced by several wars and one industrial revolution +/- my own spin. medicine wasn't my area but i know a thing or two about mysterious energy sources and their potentialities.
tell you what if i do lose my arm you'll be the first to know.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
i would have named mine like COLD STEEL or QUICK SILVER or something but you do you
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)