heirring: (responsible and mature individual)
Wysteria Poppell ([personal profile] heirring) wrote in [community profile] therookery2022-05-21 09:48 pm

crystal;


FORM: Crystal
SENDER: Richard Dickerson & Wysteria de Foncé
RECIPIENT: You All
NOTES: The highly scientific results from studying a not-so-recent amputation, and a call for volunteers (don't worry, it's not volunteering to get your limbs chopped off). Wysteria is in blue. Richard is in green.


Hello everyone. This is Madame de Foncé speaking, accompanied by Mister Dickerson. There is a whole report written up on the matter which we wish to discuss today. Anyone curious will find it filed among the Project Felandaris records. However, we agreed [sure that's the word for 'Wysteria bullied Richard into it'] that discussing the broad points in a more public venue might do some good.

Go ahead, Mister Dickerson.


Dissection of Madame de Foncé’s arm revealed extensions of the anchor growing outward along the vascular system, confirming the existing supposition that as much of the affected limb should be taken as possible to ensure an anchor is truly separated from its host.

[ There is an odd beat where it seems likely Mister Dickerson is hoping for Wysteria to chirp back in before he continues: ]

It further appears that lyrium has an affinity for -- [ more quietly ] Rifter flesh, for lack of a more delicate distinction. When exposed to Madame de Foncé’s arm it made a fleeting attempt to regrow the parts of her that were missing. [ So the rest of the Wysteria? Another pause. He doesn’t deign to specify. ]

We believe it may hold promise as a healing agent for Rifters if applied topically.

[Which brings them to the true aim of this whole endeavor, the enthusiasm for which has Wysteria's clipping in so briskly after him that there's almost no pause at all between 'if applied topically,' and—]

And so Mister Dickerson and I would like to make a request for volunteers from among the Rifter population. We would like to make a more thorough study of the effects of lyrium on us. I have prepared a sort of sign up form and have posted it on the door of Project Felandaris' office. If you would please add your name to it, Mister Dickerson, and myself, and indeed the general record would be most grateful.

That's all. Thank you. Ask whatever questions you wish to.


[Slightly muffled then, as if the crystal has been lowered away from the general nexus of conversation, Wysteria continues on in the same breath, 'You see, Mister Dickerson? That wasn't painful in the slightest. I hardly see why you were so hesitant—']
exequy: (49)

[personal profile] exequy 2022-05-22 10:01 pm (UTC)(link)
I hope you are taking notes on how many rifters are cowards. It might mean something.
detestable: (189)

[personal profile] detestable 2022-05-22 10:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Care to show us how it's done, skippy? Nurse Ratched here's got sharps to spare from what I'm hearing.
exequy: (1104)

[personal profile] exequy 2022-05-22 10:21 pm (UTC)(link)
I am not a rifter. I am a mage. How lyrium affects us is well documented.
detestable: (152)

[personal profile] detestable 2022-05-22 10:22 pm (UTC)(link)
So you're familiar. The blistering, the nausea, memory loss, whatever else Dick isn't sharing? Or does the wizard hat give you a free pass?
exequy: (220)

[personal profile] exequy 2022-05-22 10:27 pm (UTC)(link)
From raw lyrium? No. It kills us.
detestable: (Default)

[personal profile] detestable 2022-05-22 10:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Really.

[ it doesn't not check out, however— ]

You're serious? No respawns, just instant death if you get a jab of it?
exequy: (165)

[personal profile] exequy 2022-05-22 10:41 pm (UTC)(link)
I understand there is some suffering first.
detestable: (038)

[personal profile] detestable 2022-05-22 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Interesting. You can see how this isn't exactly a ringing endorsement of the stuff.
exequy: (26)

[personal profile] exequy 2022-05-22 11:08 pm (UTC)(link)
They are hardly going throw you into a vat of raw lyrium as a first step.

(no subject)

[personal profile] detestable - 2022-05-22 23:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] exequy - 2022-05-22 23:47 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] detestable - 2022-05-23 01:57 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] exequy - 2022-05-23 13:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] detestable - 2022-05-26 03:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] exequy - 2022-05-29 23:08 (UTC) - Expand
nonvenomous: (pic#14254277)

[personal profile] nonvenomous 2022-05-22 10:58 pm (UTC)(link)
That they're exhausted by the prospect of overextending themselves further than they already have on behalf of your miserable plane, perhaps.
exequy: (51)

[personal profile] exequy 2022-05-22 11:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Nothing is stopping any of you from opening a bakery in Lowtown.
nonvenomous: (dick being a dick)

[personal profile] nonvenomous 2022-05-22 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)
You're right. Curious how compliant we all are with such a desirable opportunity so close at hand.
exequy: (04)

[personal profile] exequy 2022-05-22 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)
You could also consider becoming a butcher.
nonvenomous: (pic#14254273)

[personal profile] nonvenomous 2022-05-24 07:52 am (UTC)(link)
I don't have the stomach for it.
exequy: (56)

[personal profile] exequy 2022-05-29 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)
With all this?

[ Not feigned surprise. If Richard is being sarcastic, it has flown over his bullish head. ]
nonvenomous: (i understand humor)

[personal profile] nonvenomous 2022-05-29 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
I am beginning to understand the danger inherent in magic being inherited rather than conferred or studied.

(no subject)

[personal profile] exequy - 2022-05-29 23:49 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] nonvenomous - 2022-05-30 05:42 (UTC) - Expand
exequy: (162)

[personal profile] exequy 2022-05-22 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)
[ Suspicious pause. It was, maybe, before he segued into just saying whatever thing occurred to him to say. An attempt.

But even he can see that it is no longer even arguably helpful, so: ]


No.
exequy: (305)

[personal profile] exequy 2022-05-22 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)
exequy: (308)

[personal profile] exequy 2022-05-22 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)
[ Ugh fine. ]
fairforce: (75)

[personal profile] fairforce 2022-05-25 03:53 am (UTC)(link)
That's a terribly unfair statement.
exequy: (52)

[personal profile] exequy 2022-05-29 11:08 pm (UTC)(link)
You think so?
fairforce: (31)

[personal profile] fairforce 2022-06-01 03:31 am (UTC)(link)
I do, very much, considering it seems based only on opinion.