aforethought: crying for three days (Default)
Melys ([personal profile] aforethought) wrote in [community profile] therookery2017-08-27 04:09 pm

Crystals | OTA

FORM: Crystals
SENDER: Melys
RECIPIENT: Everyone!
WHAT: IC Would-you-rather
WHEN: Now-ish
WHERE: ~Everywhere~
NOTES: Threadjack like mad, please.

without preamble, ]

So here’s what: You make up two choices. Maybe they’re both shit, or maybe they’re both alright, but you say them — 
then you gotta say which one you’d pick, if you had to.

And maybe why. And then everyone else’s gotta answer too. 
Like this, 

Would you rather not be able t'lie, or only be able to? 


— And no one gives a damn for who you’re fucking or who fucked you over, so don’t go dragging that mess in here or I’ll 
puke on your shoes.

aventuriere: (Default)

[personal profile] aventuriere 2017-08-31 05:39 am (UTC)(link)
I could, if you'd like. Though I'd recommend Ramseur's recent dialectic on the language/action dichotomy, its quite good, if a bit florid in places.

My point was that you are comparing apples and oranges. Saying that you mean nothing by your actions is fundamentally different than speaking words that have no meaning.