Bastien (
cozen) wrote in
therookery2022-02-01 09:39 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
- abby,
- bastien,
- benedict quintus artemaeus,
- byerly rutyer,
- edgard,
- ellie,
- fifi mariette,
- gwenaëlle strange,
- loki,
- sidony venaras,
- tsenka abendroth,
- val de foncé,
- wysteria de foncé,
- yevdokiya an waslyna o bearhold,
- yseult,
- { adrasteia },
- { allumin estija },
- { astarion },
- { cassius black },
- { cole },
- { dante sparda },
- { diabhall minett },
- { emet-selch },
- { fenris },
- { fitcher },
- { joselyn smythe },
- { laura kint }
crystal.
FORM: Crystal
SENDER: Bastien
RECIPIENT: Everyone
NOTES: Nonsense. If your characters will not say anything but are obviously/observably involved with people, please feel even more encouraged than normal to "not here" reply with the deets for everyone's gossip-gathering purposes.
Bonjour, mes amis.
[ Faintly sing-song, but in a drawling and subdued way. It doesn't do to sound too chipper and excited about asking people semi-invasive questions. ]
I have been talking to the Seneschal, and we thought—well, it's possible we might need a fraternization policy. Or a record, at least, in case it becomes a problem later. And to decide whether that is necessary: information about fraternization.
[ It's obvious from his voice that he's pleased that that rhymes. ]
So who is together? Or involved, if together is a scary word.
Please feel very free to rat out your bashful friends.
[ As an afterthought, ]
If you have opinions about the policy or record part, I will take those, too.
no subject
But of course I also meant that such official bondages would make quite clear such fraternizations.
no subject
We might need to petition the Chantry to change some of the rules about marriage, first, but I don't see why they wouldn't go along with it.
no subject
no subject
Arranged, perhaps, for those who cannot find their own?
no subject